Author: Ryan Gavin

  • RELEASE: House committee reloads initiative petition legislation with ‘ballot candy’

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Tuesday, April 2, 2024
    Contact: liz@progressmo.org

    Politicians scheme to trick voters into giving away rights, end 100 years of majority rule

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – The Missouri House Election Committee today moved forward with adding so-called ballot candy to SJR74, a shameful move meant to trick voters. The resolution would dismantle democracy as Missourians have known it for over 100 years. SJR74, as currently constructed, would end majority rule in Missouri, potentially requiring more than 70% of a statewide vote for any constitutional amendment to pass.

    “Everyone knows why this resolution is loaded with ballot candy,” said Liz McCune, Executive Director of Progress Missouri. “Missourians hate these plans to end majority rule. Politicians are trying every trick they can to distract and confuse us from their real agenda. These changes will result in making politicians even more powerful while making it harder for Missourians to have a say and go around a legislature that often ignores them.”

    Today, the House committee added items to the Senate passed version of SJR74, including a requirement that those who vote in Missouri elections be U.S. citizens and a clause that foreign governments cannot fund ballot initiative efforts. BOTH OF THESE ITEMS ARE ALREADY REQUIRED UNDER MISSOURI LAW.

    “The ballot candy is designed to hide the true impact of the measure and gain support from voters who don’t know that several items in the ballot summary are already required by law,” said Marilyn McLeod, President of the League of Women Voters of Missouri. “The initiative process is an important part of democracy in Missouri and the suggested changes would squelch the voice of the people, overturning the sacred principle of ‘one person, one vote’.”

    Since the beginning of the year, thousands of Missourians voiced their opposition to attacks on the initiative petition process, many pointing out that the process already in place gives Missourians the power to make direct decisions about policies that impact them and their families.

    Missourians are urged to let their legislator know they oppose these efforts to trick Missourians into giving their rights away and making it harder for votes to count.

  • Under the Dome – March 29

    Under the Dome graphic with Missouri State Capitol Dome in background

    Welcome back to Under the Dome, your weekly update on the goings-on of the Missouri state legislature.

    Legislative homestretch likely to focus on dismantling the initiative petition process and passing budget, education bill, health care

    With eight weeks left in the 2024 Missouri legislative session, no legislation has passed through both chambers.

    Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, R-Arnold, asked a House committee to add back ballot candy provisions that were stripped from the Senate resolution.

    League of Women Voters members showed that politicians won’t trick them into giving up their rights as they supported majority rule at Voting Rights Lobby Day at the Missouri State Capitol.

    Before they went on spring break, senators passed an over 150-page omnibus education bill. However, it must now go through the House, where it will likely undergo changes as it faces opposition from both homeschool and local public school advocates.

    This session, lawmakers also must pass a tax that funds that bulk of Missouri’s Medicaid program and the state’s $50 billion operating budget.

    Poll shows Missourians overwhelmingly support access to contraceptives despite efforts to politicize it

    77% of respondents across party lines said people should be allowed to access an annual supply of birth control. Photo: Getty Images.

    New polling data released Thursday shows that birth control is not considered controversial by Missourians.

    “During a time when many issues divide people in our state, birth control enjoys near universal support,” Michelle Trupiano, executive director of Missouri Family Health Council, said.

    The survey polled 1,000 Missourians between 18-35, split almost evenly among Democrats, Republicans and Independents. Most of those polled – including 84% of Democrats, 61% of Independents and about half of Republicans – expressed concern that their legislature will push laws restricting birth control.

    House votes to repeal corporate income taxes saying the big business billion-dollar giveaway will have a trickle-down effect

    The Missouri House sent a bill repealing the corporate income tax to the Senate on a party-line vote Wednesday, with Democrats calling it a business giveaway.

    The corporate income tax is paid by larger companies with many stockholders. A fiscal note for the bill estimates it would reduce state revenues by at least $884 million when fully implemented. The state collected $13.2 billion in general revenue in the fiscal year that ended June 30.

    SOS race: Plocher files before going in front of the House Ethics Committee; Coleman fails to carry her MO-3 campaign to term to join the primary

    Plocher and Coleman, facing scrutiny for behaviors in their current offices, both jumped into the secretary of state race before Tuesday’s deadline. Photo from St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

    Two state legislators who had been seeking different offices abandoned their bids on Tuesday and instead filed paperwork to run for secretary of state.

    State Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, R-Arnold, dropped her bid to represent the 3rd Congressional District and joined the Republican race for secretary of state.

    Earlier Tuesday, House Speaker Dean Plocher ended his campaign for lieutenant governor. Instead he launched his bid for secretary of state before his 4 p.m. appearance in front of the House Ethics Committee.

  • Under the Dome – March 22

    Under the Dome graphic with Missouri State Capitol Dome in background

    Welcome back to Under the Dome, your weekly update on the goings-on of the Missouri state legislature.

    Legislators promise ballot candy will be back in SJR 74 when session resumes

    Even Spring Break couldn’t deter legislators from attacking majority rule in Missouri. House Speaker Dean Plocher took to Twitter on Tuesday to announce that the House would be adding back the ballot candy the Senate previously removed.

    Tweet from Dean Plocher on Tuesday

    Specifically, Plocher said they would be addressing “noncitizen voting,” which he would know was already illegal if he took two seconds to read the requirements on the Missouri Secretary of State website. But while it’s fair to question his literacy based on how many scandals he’s been involved in this session, he and his fellow supermajority are more likely doing it to trick Missouri voters into passing incredibly unpopular legislation by sweetening it up (hence the term).

    Specifically, Plocher said they would be addressing “noncitizen voting,” which he would know was already illegal if he took two seconds to read the requirements on the Missouri Secretary of State website. But while it’s fair to question his literacy based on how many scandals he’s been involved in this session, he and his fellow supermajority are more likely doing it to trick Missouri voters into passing incredibly unpopular legislation by sweetening it up (hence the term).

    Screenshot from the official Missouri Secretary of State website

    Protecting majority rule has broad bipartisan support. Conservative, pro-democracy organizations such as Show Me Integrity and Conservatives Against Corruption have spoken out against the legislation that would change Missouri’s century-old law.
    KMOV News highlighted the voice of conservative Fred Steinbach, former mayor of Chesterfield and finance director for former Gov. John Ashcroft:

    “I oppose SJR 74 and any efforts to make it harder for Missourians to exercise our Constitutional freedom of the citizen initiative process. In 1992, my former boss Governor Ashcroft vetoed similar attacks on the citizen initiative process. The then-Democratic majority was attacking the will of the people, and trying to make the initiative process more difficult, because the Democrats were bitter that conservatives had been using the citizen initiative, including to pass the Hancock Amendment with only 55% of the vote.”

    Scandal-ridden Speaker Plocher feels the walls closing in

    Speaker Plocher in a conference room
    Photo by Tim Bommmel / House Communications

    While Plocher went on a buzzword-riddled tirade attacking majority rule, he also spent his Spring Break trying to discredit the Missouri Independent, which has been a journalistic leader in its reporting on his near-constant stream of scandals. Not once in the rant did he refute a single fact from their extensive and well-sourced reporting.

    From the latest Missouri Independent story, the bipartisan House Ethics Committee investigating Plocher will reconvene at 4 p.m. Tuesday, the fifth hearing on Plocher in 2024.

    In case you’ve missed his laundry list of scandals, he’s been accused over the last few months of pushing for the House to enter into a contract with a private company outside the normal bidding process; threatening retaliation against legislative staff who pushed back on that contract; improperly firing a potential whistleblower; filing false expense reports for travel already paid for by his campaign; and arranging meetings between legislators and an out-of-state vendor.

    Maybe he left his tinfoil hat in the new $60,000 liquor pantry he replaced a fellow legislator’s office with.

  • Missouri House continues assault on majority rule

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Tuesday, March 12, 2024
    Contact: liz@progressmo.org

    Missourians are standing up to protect the essential principle of ‘one person, one vote’

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – As the House begins debate on SJR74 – the resolution that would upend the initiative petition process as Missourians have known it – Missourians across the state are pushing back on attempts to undermine majority rule.

    “I am dismayed that politicians in Jefferson City are attacking our deepest held democratic ideals by aggressively pushing forward changes to the initiative petition process despite overwhelming opposition to these changes voiced by Missourians like me,” said Beth Franklin, a U.S. Army veteran and Missouri native from Plattsburg. “SJR74 and initiatives like it could allow a small fraction of Missourians to overrule what the majority wants, ending 100 years of majority rule in Missouri. Politicians are intentionally tricking us into giving our rights away!”

    During the past several weeks, a bipartisan coalition of thousands of Missourians have voiced their opposition to attacks on the initiative petition process, many pointing out that the process already in place gives Missourians the power to make decisions about policies that impact them and their families.

    “I believe that any attempts to compromise majority rule in initiative petitions should be turned down,” said John Nekola, a horticulturist from St. Louis who collected signatures for an initiative petition in the 1980s. “Advocates from any point of view could be restricted from participation in the referendum process by requiring a supermajority. By allowing the voters to decide an issue that may not come up in the legislature, the initiative process is a vital part of democracy.”

    The initiative petition process gives Missourians the power to make decisions about issues that will impact them and their families. These proposed changes purposely make it harder for Missourians to have their voices heard.

    “The League of Women Voters believes responsible government should be responsive to the will of the people,” said Marilyn McLeod, President of the League of Women Voters of Missouri. “The citizen initiative petition is the most direct form of voter participation in our democracy. This valuable and trusted process has been enshrined in the Missouri Constitution for more than 100 years and has been used for both conservative and progressive issues. It is already a complicated and difficult process. Therefore, the League of Women Voters of Missouri opposes any attempts to make it more difficult to get a measure on the ballot or to raise the threshold for approval.”

    Progress Missouri is urging Missourians to let their legislator know they oppose these efforts to trick Missourians into giving their rights away.

    ###

  • Under the Dome – March 8

    Under the Dome graphic with Missouri State Capitol Dome in background

    Welcome back to Under the Dome, your weekly update on the goings-on of the Missouri state legislature.

    Governor’s clemency decision spotlights systemic injustice

    The week in Missouri politics began with a shameful display of misplaced mercy as Gov. Mike Parson decided to shorten the prison sentence of former Kansas City Chiefs assistant coach Britt Reid while admitting he had not bothered to reach out to the family of Ariel Young.

    Young was 5 when she suffered a traumatic brain injury as a result of an accident caused by Reid – son of Chief coach Andy Reid – who was driving while intoxicated. As the Kansas City Star pointed out in Vahe Gregorian’s column, the governor is an avid Chiefs fan. 

    The case highlights the systemic injustice inherent in the commutation process. Earlier, Parson declined to pardon Kevin Strickland, whom a Jackson County prosecutor said was “factually innocent” of a 1978 triple murder. Despite the extraordinary plea from a prosecutor to release Strickland, who is Black, Parson declined because he said he didn’t know if the man was “innocent or not.”

    Reflecting on the decision, Justice Horn, chair of the LGBTQ Commission of Kansas City, said simply: “There are two systems of justice in this country.”

    Brother speaks up on legislator’s attempt to bully LGBTQ+ kids and their teachers

    This week the brother of Missouri Representative Jamie Gragg spoke out against his Ozark sibling’s “hateful and malicious” anti-trans bill that would label teachers as sex offenders if they support transgender students by using their chosen name and pronouns. 

    In an interview with the Riverfront Times, Charles Gragg Jr. said the legislation “will cost lives and recklessly destroy others just for the sin of being compassionate.”

    Meanwhile, for the second year in a row, a Missouri House committee debated GOP-backed legislation that would face the same limits on drag performances as govern “sexually oriented businesses.”

    The bill, sponsored by Bethany Republican Rep. Mazzie Christensen, would also create penalties for engaging in an adult cabaret performance in a location where it could be “reasonably expected to be viewed by a person who is not an adult.” The first offense would be a misdemeanor and the second a felony.

    Opponents to the legislation argued that not all drag is sexual in nature, and the legislation would further marginalize LGBTQ+ Missourians.

    And while the legislature pretends this is all to “protect children,” actual victims of sexual assault, like the Kanakuk and Agape tragedies, are asking legislators to address Missouri’s restrictive statute of limitations on legal recourse.

    House backs political stunt to send soldiers and state troopers to Texas border

    Speaking of misplaced priorities, this week the Missouri House overwhelmingly supported Gov. Mike Parson’s $2.2 million plan to send soldiers and state troopers to the Mexican border by voting 122-12 for the money needed to finance it.

    As reported in the Missouri Independent, Parson is sending 200 Missouri National Guard soldiers and 11 Missouri State Highway Patrol troopers to work with Texas law enforcement at the request of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. There are also about 250 National Guard soldiers from Missouri in Texas operating under federal orders and paid from the federal treasury.

  • Under the Dome – March 1

    Under the Dome graphic with Missouri State Capitol Dome in background

    Welcome back to Under the Dome, your weekly update on the goings-on of the Missouri state legislature.

    Legislators spin wheels on legislation that would hurt their own constituents, file frivolous lawsuits

    This week seemed like an epic battle over control as legislators set their sights anywhere but where voters seem to need or want them.

    A House bill introduced by Rep. Jamie Ray Gragg, R-Ozark, would put teachers on the sex offender registry if they “contribute to the social transition of a trans youth,” including using their pronouns or expressing support for their gender expression through haircuts or clothes. That’s right – complimenting a kid’s outfit could mark you as a sex offender under the language of H.B. 2885.

    Defunding Planned Parenthood for work they don’t do

    Meanwhile, the Missouri House gave initial approval to legislation that would halt public funding, including Medicaid reimbursements, for any facilities and their affiliates that provide abortions. That would render Planned Parenthood without funding even though the organization doesn’t perform abortions in Missouri, as required by law. The legislation would curtail what the organization IS doing, such as providing essential reproductive health services like contraceptive access and cancer screenings, on which thousands of Missourians depend.

    Using doctored videos as “evidence”

    Unelected Attorney General Andrew Bailey piled this week on by filing a lawsuit against Planned Parenthood, using as evidence a staged, edited video from right-wing Project Veritas. The video from the conservative news organization founded in 2010 claims to show the illegal transport of teens out of state for abortions. Planned Parenthood maintains the “evidence” has been highly doctored and edited.

    Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, told the Missouri Independent that Bailey tweeted about the lawsuit before it was officially filed in the courthouse.

    “This is a press release dressed up as legal action from an unelected attorney general,” Wales said. “It is based on ‘evidence’ from fraudulent, extreme anti-abortion actors, who claim to be ‘journalists.’”

    KKK is in the GOP house

    Finally, this week the Riverfront Times broke a shameful story that a man with a history of “honorary” membership in the Klu Klux Klan not only managed to make it on the unofficial ballot to be the Republican nominee for Missouri governor but may even appear atop the official ballot when GOP voters vote in the primary this August.

    Those revelations came to light last night when former Missouri Representative Shamed Dogan (R-Ballwin) tweeted out a screenshot showing the unofficial candidate filing list for Governor posted to the Secretary of State’s website. On it, Darrell Leon McClanahan III’s name sits atop more well-known GOP contenders like Mike Kehoe and Jay Ashcroft. 

  • Under the Dome – February 23

    Under the Dome graphic with Missouri State Capitol Dome in background

    Welcome back to Under the Dome, your weekly update on the goings-on of the Missouri state legislature.

    Majority rule under threat as resolution stripping voters of rights moves to House

    This week, the Missouri Senate moved forward legislation that would end majority rule in Missouri, taking away rights that Missourians have utilized for more than 100 years to keep legislators accountable and advance legislation favored by voters.

    Thanks to a strong pushback by key legislators, Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman’s SJR74 was stripped of “ballot candy.” The resolution now moves to the House for debate, where extreme politicians are threatening to return “ballot candy,” a blatant admission of resorting to trickery to steamroll their permanent plans to take voters’ rights.

    Coleman speaking about purposefully including “ballot candy” in SJR74 on the floor of the Missouri Senate, via Missouri Senate Communications video.

    The resolution approved in the Senate would require what’s called a concurrent majority, meaning that in addition to passing the entire state, any constitutional ballot issue would also need to be approved by a majority vote in five of the state’s eight congressional districts. According to an analysis from the Missouri Independent, as few as 23% of voters – a majority in the four districts with the lowest number of voters in 2020 and 2022 – could defeat a statewide ballot measure.

    The legislature continues to ignore public outcry to their plans to end majority rule, which has been overwhelming and bipartisan.

    Progress MO is calling on Missourians from all parts of the state to urgently contact their legislators to demand that they vote no on these efforts to dismantle majority rule and seize their rights in Missouri.

    Freedom Caucus members smear KC dad, spread fear and hate

    Denton Loudermill and his family in their neighborhood, via family photo shared with the Kansas City Star.

    This week also featured continued swamp creature behavior from the “Freedom” Caucus when members and the Caucus’s own social media channels were caught falsely accusing a KC dad of being a mass shooter and illegal immigrant.

    Three Missouri lawmakers shared posts with a photo of a man that claimed him as one of the suspects in the mass shooting, which killed one person and injured more than 20 people. The post not only smeared an innocent man but also falsely fueled illegal immigration fears.

    Asked for an apology, lawmakers instead doubled down. As reported in the Kansas City Star, Sen. Rick Brattin, R-Harrisonville and chair of the hard-right Missouri Freedom Caucus, refused to apologize or even recognize that they did anything wrong.

    “I’m not even commenting on that,” Brattin told the Kansas City Star. “That’s not even part of the discussion.”

    When pressed, Brattin signaled that he didn’t think his false post was worth an apology.

    “There’s nothing that I even see – even worth that,” he said. “So we’ve done nothing. And, you know, I have no comment.”

    House Speaker under fire for yet another scandal

    Finally, this week the St. Louis Post-Dispatch exposed that so-called “lifelong conservative” Dean Plocher doubled his office’s payroll in the past five years while embroiled in a series of ongoing scandals.

    After firing two of his employees and watching as another resigned amid a midterm shake-up, the embattled House Speaker is overseeing an office payroll that could cost taxpayers double the amount it under then-Speaker Elijah Haahr in February 2020.

    According to payroll records provided by the House human resources office, the annual payroll for the speaker’s office as of Feb. 1 was $746,427, compared to $495,832 in his maiden year as the leader of the Legislature’s lower chamber.

  • RELEASE: Senate passes plan to end majority rule, sends to House

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Thursday, February 22, 2024
    Contact: liz@progressmo.org

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Progress MO released the following statement today regarding the Senate passing SJR74, the radical proposal to end majority rule in Missouri: 

    “Make no mistake: this proposal from politicians would end majority rule in Missouri — taking away rights we have held dear for more than 100 years. We are confident voters will see this power grab by politicians for what it is, and will reject it.”

    The plan now heads to the Missouri House. The legislature continues to ignore public outcry to their plans to end majority rule, which has been overwhelming and bipartisan.

    Progress MO is calling on Missourians from all parts of the state to urgently contact their legislators to demand that they vote no on these efforts to dismantle majority rule and seize their rights in Missouri.

    ###

  • RELEASE: Senate advances plan to end majority rule

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Monday, February 19, 2024
    Contact: liz@progressmo.org

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Progress MO released the following statement today regarding the perfection vote of SJR74, the radical proposal to end majority rule in Missouri: 

    “Make no mistake: this proposal from politicians would end majority rule in Missouri — taking away rights we have held dear for more than 100 years. We are confident voters will see this power grab by politicians for what it is, and will reject it.”

    Public outcry to politicians’ plans to end majority rule has been overwhelming and bipartisan.

    Progress MO is calling on Missourians from all parts of the state to urgently contact their legislators to demand that they vote no on these efforts to dismantle majority rule and seize their rights in Missouri.

    ###

  • RELEASE: Senate extremists celebrate Presidents Day by trying again to end majority rule

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Monday, February 19, 2024
    Contact: liz@progressmo.org

    “There absolutely is ballot candy” to deceive voters about the true goals of the measure, admitted Senate sponsor

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Despite overwhelming testimony against changing how Missourians can bring issues important to them to the ballot, the Missouri Senate today continued discussions about undermining the initiative petition process.

    “Ending majority rule would be a dramatic step backwards for Missouri,” said Marilyn McLeod, President of the League of Women Voters of Missouri. “If passed, it would shred our constitution, ending 100 years of majority rule in Missouri, and taking away your right to decide what happens here. We need to protect our freedom to determine our future in Missouri, not permanently change our constitution to give up our rights. Simple majority rule is common sense and already the law of the land in Missouri.”

    If passed, SJR74 would end majority rule in Missouri, potentially requiring more than 70% of a statewide vote for any constitutional amendment to pass. Just last week, sponsoring Senator Mary Elizabeth Coleman admitted her proposal to end majority rule on constitutional amendments is loaded with “ballot candy,” politician-speak for deception.

    “There absolutely is ballot candy,” Coleman said of her proposal to end majority rule on constitutional amendments in Missouri.

    Special interests and lobbyists are pushing this constitutional amendment because they can’t control citizens the way they control corrupt politicians. If they destroy our constitution to get rid of ballot initiatives as we know them in Missouri, it will mean more power for special interests and less power for voters to decide on the issues that matter the most. That’s why politicians are trying to add illegal “ballot candy” to mislead voters about what this amendment would do: shred the constitution to end majority rule in Missouri.

    “While many Americans celebrated Presidents Day by honoring our presidents and commitment to democracy, these extreme Jefferson City politicians decided to attack majority rule and our very system of government,” said Liz McCune, Executive Director of Progress Missouri. “This proposal from politicians is so brazenly contradictory to long-held Missouri values, like majority rule, that they know they must trick voters to get it done.”

    During the past several weeks, a bipartisan coalition of thousands of Missourians have voiced their opposition to attacks on the initiative petition process, many pointing out that the process already in place gives Missourians the power to make decisions about policies that impact them and their families.

    ###